日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

 

A better way to gauge our well-being

0 CommentsPrint E-mail Global Times, November 22, 2010
Adjust font size:

The "happiness index" has increasingly shifted from a psychological topic to the center theme of the governments' administrative guidelines. The phrase now frequently appears in government reports from the UK to China's local governments.

First coined by the tiny mountain country of Bhutan, gross national happiness (GNH) is built on the core elements of sustainable development, the preservation of cultural values, the conservation of the natural environment, and the establishment of good governance. Now, governments including France and Canada are working to develop their own versions of the happiness index.

It is widely accepted that economic growth and wealth accumulation do not necessarily lead to a sense of happiness. The question is what is the exact composition of happiness?

China ranks differently in various polls, from 29th on the Happy Planet Index 2.0 done by the New Economics Foundation in 2009 to No. 125 in a recent Gallup World Poll.

It is difficult to depict an individual's status as being happy or not, and it is even more so to find a way of gauging a country's well-being, though there seems to be no lack of grumpy ordinary people in China nowadays.

It is necessary for China to define "happiness" that suits the country. There are now many rather vague attempts to incorporate the idea of happiness into administration. For example, in the assessment of local officials' performance, additional yardsticks such as citizens' satisfaction are taken into consideration. A serious environmental accident can completely wipe out an official's chance of promotion.

Meanwhile, though GDP does not equal happiness, it is not correct to dismiss the relationship between GDP and happiness.

The basic elements of a quality life, a stable job and advanced social welfare, rely on continued economic development. A fast growing country with abundant opportunities for individuals should be more able to create sense of happiness than a country struggling in stagnancy.

Everyone has their own definition of happiness, but a general consensus among the public can help iron out disagreements and regulate individual behavior in everyday life. Societies that emphasize family values and encourage innovation are generally considered as having happier nationals.

The Chinese public wants a greater sense of happiness in their everyday lives now. Coming up with China's own version of a happiness index, rather than adopting a Western interpretation, is a reasonable solution.

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 淮南市| 丰城市| 澎湖县| 喀喇沁旗| 塔河县| 醴陵市| 江安县| 宜黄县| 沅陵县| 茌平县| 安仁县| 腾冲县| 邻水| 东源县| 阿拉善左旗| 安平县| 安仁县| 普洱| 苏尼特右旗| 安远县| 云阳县| 祁连县| 崇明县| 徐州市| 通城县| 海口市| 汽车| 鄯善县| 呼伦贝尔市| 桐庐县| 稷山县| 聂拉木县| 镇坪县| 长宁县| 慈利县| 鹤庆县| 宁明县| 丘北县| 双鸭山市| 黔西县| 普宁市|