日韩午夜精品视频,欧美私密网站,国产一区二区三区四区,国产主播一区二区三区四区

 

Rare-earth limits not aimed at foreign market

By John Gong
0 CommentsPrint E-mail Global Times, October 25, 2010
Adjust font size:

What the Chinese government has been doing is to introduce law and order in this otherwise free-wheeling Wild West. China has tightened up environmental regulations to root out unscrupulous companies.

Export quotas have been put in place to protect those companies that stick to proper production standards.

The overall objective is to preserve natural resources and maintain healthy industry growth.

Against this background, I find it odd that Krugman would be on the Japanese side at the cost of US interests.

The rare-earth export situation is not so different from toys and textiles from China, in that the AFL-CIO would usually be the first to voice concerns about poor environment and workplace safety standards in China, making Chinese costs unjustifiably low while making US production uncompetitive and eliminating US jobs.

Nevertheless, according to Krugman, the issue is all about playing by the rules in international trade. As a specialist in this field, I'd like to make the WTO rules clear.

Article XI of the 1994 General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) generally prohibits quantitative restrictions on the importation or the exportation of any product. However, the GATT also provides exceptions to this fundamental principle, one of which is critical for China's defense if its stance ever gets challenged at the WTO.

Export restrictions are allowed that are necessary to the application of standards or regulations for the classification, grading or marketing of commodities in international trade. China's effort to clean up the industry clearly represents one form of this.

Furthermore, GATT Article XX provides exceptions that are free from member countries' general WTO obligations.

Specifically, article XX(9) allows members to adopt measures relating to the conservation of exhaustible natural resources if such measures are made effective in conjunction with restrictions on domestic production or consumption.

All Beijing needs to do is to make these measures more effective.

The author is a faculty member of the Beijing-based University of International Business and Economics. johngong@gmail. com

   Previous   1   2  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 陇南市| 称多县| 中宁县| 南丰县| 义马市| 苗栗市| 长兴县| 顺昌县| 海兴县| 通榆县| 金川县| 青海省| 鄱阳县| 墨玉县| 光山县| 澳门| 察雅县| 当雄县| 夏邑县| 县级市| 陆良县| 邯郸县| 新绛县| 磴口县| 竹溪县| 茶陵县| 盱眙县| 呼伦贝尔市| 岐山县| 柳江县| 庄浪县| 柳江县| 拜泉县| 深泽县| 潮安县| 南开区| 江西省| 丁青县| 定州市| 仙桃市| 铜川市|